Run 1 summary

https://matchbestsoftware.com

Tested 2026-08-06 14:40:47 using Chrome 150.0.7871.186 (runtime settings)

SummaryWaterfallMetricsRenderingCoachPageXrayThird party

Summary

Google Web Vitals

1.217 sTTFB
3.420 sLargest Contentful Paint
0.008Cumulative Layout Shift
706 msTotal Blocking Time

Loading

1.992 sFirst Paint
19.362 sFully Loaded
244 msMax Potential FID

Page weight & requests

970.1 KBTotal transfer size
14.8 MBTotal content size
45Requests

CPU

12Long tasks
23.618 sLast long task at

Visual progress

1.933 sFirst Visual Change
3.921 sSpeed Index
3.700 sVisual Complete 85%
11.233 sVisual Complete 99%
11.233 sLast Visual Change
Screenshot
Run 1 · after page complete

Waterfall

First paintFCPLCPDOMContentLoadedDOM interactiveLoadRender-blockingRedirectError

Rendering

Run 1
0.000 s
0s2s4s6s8s10s

The red band on the timeline marks when the main thread was busy with long tasks: moments when the page could not paint or respond, however the video looks.

Download video

Filmstrip

96 frames

Use --filmstrip.showAll to show all filmstrips.

Frame at 0 ms
0 ms
0 %
Frame at 1.900 s
1.900 s
0 %
Frame at 2.000 s
2.000 s
6 %
Frame at 2.100 s
2.100 s
6 %
Frame at 2.200 s
2.200 s
6 %
Frame at 2.300 s
2.300 s
6 %
Frame at 2.400 s
2.400 s
7 %
Frame at 2.500 s
2.500 s
7 %
Frame at 2.600 s
2.600 s
7 %
Frame at 2.700 s
2.700 s
7 %
Frame at 2.800 s
2.800 s
9 %
Frame at 2.900 s
2.900 s
9 %
Frame at 3.000 s
3.000 s
9 %
Frame at 3.100 s
3.100 s
9 %
Frame at 3.200 s
3.200 s
9 %
Frame at 3.300 s
3.300 s
9 %
Frame at 3.400 s
3.400 s
9 %
Frame at 3.500 s
3.500 s
67 %
Frame at 3.600 s
3.600 s
75 %
Frame at 3.700 s
3.700 s
85 %
Frame at 3.800 s
3.800 s
88 %
Frame at 3.900 s
3.900 s
90 %
Frame at 4.000 s
4.000 s
92 %
Frame at 4.100 s
4.100 s
92 %
Frame at 4.200 s
4.200 s
92 %
Frame at 4.300 s
4.300 s
92 %
Frame at 4.400 s
4.400 s
92 %
Frame at 4.500 s
4.500 s
92 %
Frame at 4.600 s
4.600 s
92 %
Frame at 4.700 s
4.700 s
92 %
Frame at 4.800 s
4.800 s
92 %
Frame at 4.900 s
4.900 s
92 %
Frame at 5.000 s
5.000 s
92 %
Frame at 5.100 s
5.100 s
92 %
Frame at 5.200 s
5.200 s
92 %
Frame at 5.300 s
5.300 s
92 %
Frame at 5.400 s
5.400 s
92 %
Frame at 5.500 s
5.500 s
92 %
Frame at 5.600 s
5.600 s
92 %
Frame at 5.700 s
5.700 s
92 %
Frame at 5.800 s
5.800 s
92 %
Frame at 5.900 s
5.900 s
92 %
Frame at 6.000 s
6.000 s
92 %
Frame at 6.100 s
6.100 s
92 %
Frame at 6.200 s
6.200 s
92 %
Frame at 6.300 s
6.300 s
92 %
Frame at 6.400 s
6.400 s
92 %
Frame at 6.500 s
6.500 s
92 %
Frame at 6.600 s
6.600 s
92 %
Frame at 6.700 s
6.700 s
92 %
Frame at 6.800 s
6.800 s
92 %
Frame at 6.900 s
6.900 s
92 %
Frame at 7.000 s
7.000 s
93 %
Frame at 7.100 s
7.100 s
92 %
Frame at 7.200 s
7.200 s
92 %
Frame at 7.300 s
7.300 s
92 %
Frame at 7.400 s
7.400 s
92 %
Frame at 7.500 s
7.500 s
94 %
Frame at 7.600 s
7.600 s
94 %
Frame at 7.700 s
7.700 s
94 %
Frame at 7.800 s
7.800 s
94 %
Frame at 7.900 s
7.900 s
95 %
Frame at 8.000 s
8.000 s
94 %
Frame at 8.100 s
8.100 s
94 %
Frame at 8.200 s
8.200 s
94 %
Frame at 8.300 s
8.300 s
94 %
Frame at 8.400 s
8.400 s
94 %
Frame at 8.500 s
8.500 s
95 %
Frame at 8.600 s
8.600 s
94 %
Frame at 8.700 s
8.700 s
95 %
Frame at 8.800 s
8.800 s
94 %
Frame at 8.900 s
8.900 s
95 %
Frame at 9.000 s
9.000 s
94 %
Frame at 9.100 s
9.100 s
94 %
Frame at 9.200 s
9.200 s
94 %
Frame at 9.300 s
9.300 s
95 %
Frame at 9.400 s
9.400 s
94 %
Frame at 9.500 s
9.500 s
94 %
Frame at 9.600 s
9.600 s
95 %
Frame at 9.700 s
9.700 s
94 %
Frame at 9.800 s
9.800 s
94 %
Frame at 9.900 s
9.900 s
95 %
Frame at 10.000 s
10.000 s
95 %
Frame at 10.100 s
10.100 s
95 %
Frame at 10.200 s
10.200 s
95 %
Frame at 10.300 s
10.300 s
95 %
Frame at 10.400 s
10.400 s
95 %
Frame at 10.500 s
10.500 s
95 %
Frame at 10.600 s
10.600 s
94 %
Frame at 10.700 s
10.700 s
95 %
Frame at 10.800 s
10.800 s
95 %
Frame at 10.900 s
10.900 s
95 %
Frame at 11.000 s
11.000 s
95 %
Frame at 11.100 s
11.100 s
95 %
Frame at 11.200 s
11.200 s
95 %
Frame at 11.300 s
11.300 s
100 %

Click a frame to seek the video to that moment. The dot marks frames where the page changed visually.

Why was rendering delayed?

The server dominated the wait. The first byte took 1.217 s (61 % of the time to First Contentful Paint). Nothing can render before it arrives, and Google Web Vitals considers a TTFB over 800 ms in need of improvement. See the request timing on the Waterfall tab. First paint landed at 1.992 s; the 1 render-blocking request was done by 1.794 s and the remaining ~198 ms is style and layout work. The largest paint followed at 3.420 s. The LCP image itself was downloaded by 2.292 s; the wait was render work, not the network.

Want to see how much CSS style-recalculation work delayed FCP and LCP, plus CPU long tasks? Run with --cpu.

Render blocking requests

13 requests · 391.8 KB

Blocking requests delay both paints: the browser renders nothing until they arrive, so they push First Contentful Paint and everything after it, including the largest paint (LCP). Requests that block the parser inside the body stall everything after them in the document. Load JavaScript with defer or async, and keep non-critical CSS off the critical path with media attributes. Bars show when each request loaded on a clock that runs to the last paint (the dashed line is FCP, the clock ends at LCP); the gap after the bars is style and layout work. Web fonts are context, not blockers: text renders invisible or in a fallback face while they load, so a font finishing after a paint is the classic reason text changed late.

RequestWhen it loadedTransferDownload
document
matchbestsoftware.com · TTFB 1.217 s
1.209 s
19.0 KB1.208 s
css · matchbestsoftware.com
511 ms
14.3 KB511 ms
1255-8befde0980f5cba9.jspotentially blocking
javascript · matchbestsoftware.com
653 ms
45.1 KB653 ms
4bd1b696-100b9d70ed4e49c1.jspotentially blocking
javascript · matchbestsoftware.com
319 ms
53.6 KB319 ms
jspotentially blocking
javascript · www.googletagmanager.com
283 ms
165.7 KB283 ms
1949-11e807bf3492fa8f.jspotentially blocking
javascript · matchbestsoftware.com
268 ms
39.2 KB268 ms
main-app-f3336e172256d2ab.jspotentially blocking
javascript · matchbestsoftware.com
260 ms
927 B260 ms
ee560e2c-b19b22704238b41a.jspotentially blocking
javascript · matchbestsoftware.com
260 ms
1.1 KB260 ms
layout-6e56323006e2b8b4.jspotentially blocking
javascript · matchbestsoftware.com
257 ms
8.4 KB257 ms
5 more requests
all done by 2.998 s
63.4 KB
LCP resource
image — downloaded by 2.254 s, rendered at 3.420 s
958 ms
27.9 KB958 ms
web font · matchbestsoftware.com
296 ms
34.8 KB296 ms
0855 ms2.565 sFCP 1.992 sLCP 3.420 s

Coach

The coach helps you find performance problems on your web page using web performance best practice rules. And gives you advice on privacy and best practices. Tested using Coach-core version 9.2.1.

Performance advice

79
3 errors9 warnings3 info
warn(0)Avoid using Google Tag Manager.googleTagManager

The page is using Google Tag Manager, this is a performance risk since non-tech users can add JavaScript to your page.

Google Tag Manager makes it possible for non tech users to add scripts to your page that will downgrade performance.

warn(0)Avoid CPU Long TaskslongTasks

The page has 12 CPU long tasks with the total of 1.373 s. The total blocking time is 706 ms and 2 long tasks before first contentful paint with total time of 167 ms. However the CPU Long Task is depending on the computer/phones actual CPU speed, so you should measure this on the same type of the device that your user is using. Use Geckoprofiler for Firefox or Chromes tracelog to debug your long tasks.

Long CPU tasks locks the thread. To the user this is commonly visible as a "locked up" page where the browser is unable to respond to user input; this is a major source of bad user experience on the web today. However the CPU Long Task is depending on the computer/phones actual CPU speed, so you should measure this on the same type of the device that your user is using. To debug you should use the Chrome timeline log and drag/drop it into devtools or use Firefox Geckoprofiler.

Offenders
  • unknown
  • unknown
  • unknown
  • self
  • self
  • self
  • self
  • self
  • self
  • self
  • self
  • self
warn(0)Avoid extra requests by setting cache headerscacheHeaders

The page has 10 requests that are missing a cache time. Configure a cache time so the browser doesn't need to download them every time. It will save 99.7 kB the next access.

The easiest way to make your page fast is to avoid doing requests to the server. Setting a cache header on your server response will tell the browser that it doesn't need to download the asset again during the configured cache time! Always try to set a cache time if the content doesn't change for every request.

Offenders
warn(0)Total JavaScript size shouldn't be too bigjavascriptSize

The total JavaScript transfer size is 441.3 kB and the uncompressed size is 1.4 MB. This is totally crazy! There is really room for improvement here.

A lot of JavaScript often means you are downloading more than you need. How complex is the page and what can the user do on the page? Do you use multiple JavaScript frameworks?

Offenders
URLTransferContent
https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-LJVDJPQLC4165.7 KB484.9 KB
https://matchbestsoftware.com/_next/static/chunks/webpack-ad7e6dcfcc6474f6.js1.7 KB3.4 KB
https://matchbestsoftware.com/_next/static/chunks/4bd1b696-100b9d70ed4e49c1.js53.2 KB169.0 KB
https://matchbestsoftware.com/_next/static/chunks/1255-8befde0980f5cba9.js44.7 KB168.8 KB
https://matchbestsoftware.com/_next/static/chunks/main-app-f3336e172256d2ab.js572 B572 B
https://matchbestsoftware.com/_next/static/chunks/ee560e2c-b19b22704238b41a.js787 B787 B
https://matchbestsoftware.com/_next/static/chunks/1356-5d2cdedc98039c8c.js5.2 KB14.0 KB
https://matchbestsoftware.com/_next/static/chunks/2619-b8db57ac19da49ac.js3.2 KB7.6 KB
https://matchbestsoftware.com/_next/static/chunks/2809-048de5f21db902cd.js39.8 KB119.1 KB
https://matchbestsoftware.com/_next/static/chunks/1949-11e807bf3492fa8f.js38.9 KB126.9 KB
https://matchbestsoftware.com/_next/static/chunks/app/layout-6e56323006e2b8b4.js8.0 KB26.8 KB
https://matchbestsoftware.com/_next/static/chunks/app/not-found-cd3b2533f0af74cd.js955 B955 B
https://matchbestsoftware.com/_next/static/chunks/app/page-c880f0e9c2938e35.js12.5 KB58.8 KB
https://matchbestsoftware.com/_next/static/chunks/2653-daf58b8ee0e72839.js3.0 KB6.0 KB
https://matchbestsoftware.com/_next/static/chunks/app/(basic-pages)/about/page-6dcb5fa5423ad88c.js4.8 KB15.0 KB
https://matchbestsoftware.com/_next/static/chunks/app/(basic-pages)/services/pag...b96e9399145d11.js8.3 KB25.1 KB
https://matchbestsoftware.com/_next/static/chunks/3235-480f9ac9d91aac30.js12.5 KB52.3 KB
https://matchbestsoftware.com/_next/static/chunks/app/careers/page-244f9ddc6491f791.js2.1 KB6.3 KB
https://matchbestsoftware.com/_next/static/chunks/8016-d01ae2f02ae93760.js20.5 KB63.2 KB
https://matchbestsoftware.com/_next/static/chunks/app/(basic-pages)/contact/page-f0f563e6b8fd68dc.js4.7 KB13.3 KB
warn(30)Don't scale images in the browseravoidScalingImages

The page has 7 images that are scaled more than 100 pixels. It would be better if those images are sent so the browser don't need to scale them.

It's easy to scale images in the browser and make sure they look good in different devices, however that is bad for performance! Scaling images in the browser takes extra CPU time and will hurt performance on mobile. And the user will download extra kilobytes (sometimes megabytes) of data that could be avoided. Don't do that, make sure you create multiple version of the same image server-side and serve the appropriate one.

Offenders
error(50)Have a fast first contentful paintfirstContentfulPaint

First contentful paint can be improved (1.992 s). It is in the Google Web Vitals needs improvement range, slower than 1.8 seconds.

The First Contentful Paint (FCP) metric measures the time from when the page starts loading to when any part of the page content is rendered on the screen. For this metric, "content" refers to text, images (including background images), <svg> elements, or non-white <canvas> elements.

infoThe favicon should be small and cacheablefavicon

The favicon has no cache time.

It is easy to make the favicon big but please avoid doing that, because every browser will then perform an unnecessarily large download. And make sure the cache headers are set for a long time for the favicon. It is easy to miss since it's another content type.

Offenders
warn(70)Apply the right priority hints to the LCP imagelcpImageHints

The LCP image is missing fetchpriority="high". Adding it tells the browser to fetch the image with high priority instead of the default heuristic (which often deprioritises hero images that are loaded after the HTML has been parsed).

When the Largest Contentful Paint element is an image, the browser priority hints applied to that element directly affect the LCP metric. The image must NOT be loading="lazy" (that defers the fetch until near-viewport, which is the opposite of what an LCP image needs) and SHOULD be fetchpriority="high" (so the browser fetches it with high priority instead of guessing). https://web.dev/articles/fetch-priority

Offenders
  • <img alt="Modern Technology Preview" width="275" height="275" decoding="async" data-nimg="1" class="object-contain dark:drop-shadow-[0_0_30px_rgba(76,29,149,0.3)] rotate-0 absolute bottom-0 left-1/6 transform -translate-x-1/2 translate-y-1/3 z-10" style="color: transparent; transform: translateY(2.06035px);" srcset="/_next/image?url=%2Fmobile1.png&amp;w=384&amp;q=75 1x, /_next/image?url=%2Fmobile1.png&amp;w=640&amp;q=75 2x" src="/_next/image?url=%2Fmobile1.png&amp;w=640&amp;q=75">
error(80)Have a fast largest contentful paintlargestContentfulPaint

Largest contentful paint can be improved 3.420 s. It is in the Google Web Vitals needs improvement range, slower than 2.5 seconds.

Largest contentful paint is one of Google Web Vitals and reports the render time of the largest image or text block visible within the viewport, relative to when the page first started loading. To be fast according to Google, it needs to render before 2.5 seconds and results over 4 seconds is poor performance.

Offenders
infoLong cache headers is goodcacheHeadersLong
warn(90)Inline CSS for faster first renderinlineCss

The page has both inline styles as well as it is requesting 1 CSS file inside of the head. Let's only inline CSS for really fast render.

In the early days of the Internet, inlining CSS was one of the ugliest things you can do. That has changed if you want your page to start rendering fast for your user. Always inline the critical CSS when you use HTTP/1 and HTTP/2 (avoid doing CSS requests that block rendering) and lazy load and cache the rest of the CSS. It is a little more complicated when using HTTP/2. Does your server support HTTP push? Then maybe that can help. Do you have a lot of users on a slow connection and are serving large chunks of HTML? Then it could be better to use the inline technique, becasue some servers always prioritize HTML content over CSS so the user needs to download the HTML first, before the CSS is downloaded.

Offenders
warn(90)Don't use private headers on static contentprivateAssets

The page has 1 request with private headers. Make sure that the assets really should be private and only used by one user. Otherwise, make it cacheable for everyone.

If you set private headers on content, that means that the content are specific for that user. Static content should be able to be cached and used by everyone. Avoid setting the cache header to private.

Offenders
warn(92)Lazy-load below-the-fold imageslazyLoadingImages

The page has 2 below-the-fold images without loading="lazy". Add loading="lazy" so the browser defers downloading and decoding them until the user scrolls them into view.

Adding loading="lazy" to an <img> tells the browser not to download or decode it until it is close to the viewport. For images that the user may never see (deep in the page, behind a tab, in a footer carousel), this saves bandwidth and main-thread time during initial render. The LCP image and any image in the initial viewport should NOT be lazy-loaded — that delays the first paint. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/img#loading

Offenders
error(95)Avoid using incorrect mime typesmimeTypes

The page has 5 misconfigured mime types.

It's not a great idea to let browsers guess content types (content sniffing), in some cases it can actually be a security risk.

Offenders
infoAdd decoding="async" to non-critical imagesdecodingAsync

The page has 1 image (out of 32) without a decoding hint. Add decoding="async" to non-critical images so the browser can decode them off the main thread.

Setting decoding="async" on an <img> tells the browser it can decode the image off the main thread, which keeps the page responsive to user interactions while images are being processed. The default ("auto") leaves the choice to the browser. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/img#decoding

Offenders

Best practice advice

94
1 warning1 info
warn(50)Page titlepageTitle

The title is too long by 17 characters. The recommended max is 60

Use a title to make the page more relevant to search engines.

infoAvoid unnecessary headersunnecessaryHeaders

There are 1 response that sets both a max-age and expires header. There are 1 response that sets a pragma no-cache header (that is a request header). There are 45 responses that sets a server header.

Do not send headers that you don't need. We look for p3p, cache-control and max-age, pragma, server and x-frame-options headers. Have a look at Andrew Betts - Headers for Hackers talk as a guide https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k92ZbrY815c or read https://www.fastly.com/blog/headers-we-dont-want.

Offenders

Privacy advice

47
1 error9 warnings5 info
warn(0)Avoid using Google Analyticsga

The page is using Google Analytics meaning you share your users private information with Google. You should use analytics that care about user privacy, something like https://matomo.org.

Google Analytics share private user information with Google that your user hasn't agreed on sharing.

infoSandbox cross-origin iframesiframeSandbox

The page embeds 1 cross-origin iframe without a sandbox attribute. Add sandbox="" with the minimum set of allow-* tokens the embed actually needs.

Adding a sandbox attribute to a cross-origin iframe restricts what the embedded page can do (script execution, form submission, top-level navigation, popups, etc.) and is one of the cheapest ways to limit the blast radius of a third-party embed. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/iframe#sandbox

Offenders
warn(0)Declare a referrer policy on the documentreferrerPolicy

No <meta name="referrer"> tag was found on the page. Set a Referrer-Policy response header (preferred) or add a meta tag, for example <meta name="referrer" content="strict-origin-when-cross-origin">.

Without an explicit referrer policy the browser falls back to the user-agent default and may leak the full URL of the previous page (including query strings) to every cross-origin request. Set a Referrer-Policy response header (preferred) or a <meta name="referrer"> tag in the document. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Referrer-Policy

warn(0)Avoid embedding services from surveillance capitalist companiessurveillance

The page embeds 1 resource from companies that profit from user surveillance. Consider privacy-respecting alternatives.

Embedding scripts or iframes from companies whose business model is surveillance capitalism (Google, Facebook, etc.) leaks detailed user data on every page view, often before the user has had a chance to consent. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveillance_capitalism for background. Prefer privacy-respecting alternatives where possible.

Offenders
warn(0)Use a strict Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks.contentSecurityPolicyHeader

Set a Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate cross-site scripting attacks. You can start with a Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only header, which only reports violations rather than blocking them.

A Content-Security-Policy response header tells the browser which sources of script, style, and other content are allowed. The most effective form is a strict CSP using nonces or hashes together with strict-dynamic; the worst is a missing header, with unsafe-inline and unsafe-eval close behind. https://web.dev/articles/strict-csp

Offenders
infoSet a Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header so cross-origin subresources opt in to being embedded.crossOriginEmbedderPolicyHeader

Set a Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header (typically require-corp or credentialless) on the document response to control cross-origin embedding.

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy (COEP) makes the page refuse to load cross-origin subresources unless they explicitly opt in via CORP or CORS. Together with Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy it puts the page in a cross-origin isolated context, which mitigates cross-window side-channel attacks (Spectre) and unlocks high-resolution timers and SharedArrayBuffer. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy

Offenders
warn(0)Set a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header to isolate the page from cross-origin windows.crossOriginOpenerPolicyHeader

Set a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header (typically same-origin) on the document response to isolate the page from cross-origin windows.

Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy (COOP) lets a page sever its window-group ties to cross-origin documents that opened it or that it opens. Together with Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy it puts the page in a cross-origin isolated context, which mitigates cross-window side-channel attacks (Spectre) and unlocks high-resolution timers and SharedArrayBuffer. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy

Offenders
infoSet a Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy header to limit who may embed the page.crossOriginResourcePolicyHeader

Set a Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy header (same-origin, same-site or cross-origin) on the document response to limit who may embed it.

Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy (CORP) is a per-response opt-in that tells the browser which origins are allowed to embed the resource. It blocks cross-origin or cross-site no-cors embedding (img, script, iframe, etc.) and is one of the building blocks of cross-origin isolation. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy

Offenders
infoSet a NEL header so the browser reports network errors back to you.nelHeader

Set a NEL header (paired with Reporting-Endpoints) to collect connection-level error reports from the field.

The NEL (Network Error Logging) response header tells the browser to record connection-level failures (DNS, TLS, HTTP errors) and ship them to a reporting endpoint. NEL pairs with the Reporting-Endpoints / Report-To header — the page declares the endpoint group and NEL points at it. Together they give you visibility into errors that never reach your origin server. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/NEL

Offenders
warn(0)Set a Permissions-Policy header to control which browser features the page can use.permissionsPolicyHeader

Set a Permissions-Policy header to control which browser features the page can use.

The Permissions-Policy response header (the successor to Feature-Policy) lets a site explicitly opt in or out of powerful browser features such as camera, microphone, geolocation, payment and clipboard. Setting a strict policy reduces the attack surface and limits what embedded third parties can do. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Permissions-Policy

Offenders
warn(0)Set a referrer-policy header to make sure you do not leak user information.referrerPolicyHeader

Set a referrer-policy header to make sure you do not leak user information.

Referrer Policy is a new header that allows a site to control how much information the browser includes with navigations away from a document and should be set by all sites. https://scotthelme.co.uk/a-new-security-header-referrer-policy/.

Offenders
infoDeclare reporting endpoints so the browser can deliver Reporting-API events.reportingEndpointsHeader

Set a Reporting-Endpoints header (or the legacy Report-To header) so CSP reports, NEL data and other Reporting-API events have an endpoint to land at.

The Reporting-Endpoints response header (the successor to Report-To) names the URLs that browsers should POST reports to. Without it, CSP report-to directives, Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy reports, NEL data and other Reporting-API events have nowhere to go. The legacy Report-To header is still accepted for older Chromium versions. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Reporting-Endpoints

Offenders
error(0)Set a strict transport header to make sure the user always use HTTPS.strictTransportSecurityHeader

Set a strict transport header to make sure the user always use HTTPS.

The HTTP Strict-Transport-Security response header (often abbreviated as HSTS) lets a web site tell browsers that it should only be accessed using HTTPS, instead of using HTTP. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Strict-Transport-Security.

Offenders
warn(0)Do not share user data with third parties.thirdPartyPrivacy

The page has 4% requests that are 3rd party (2 requests with a size of 169.7 kB). The page also have request to companies that harvest data from users and do not respect users privacy (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveillance_capitalism). The page do 1 tag-manager request and uses 1 tag-manager tool. The page do 2 surveillance requests and uses 2 surveillance tools. The page do 1 analytics request and uses 1 analytics tool.

Using third party requests shares user information with that third party. Please avoid that! The project https://github.com/patrickhulce/third-party-web is used to categorize first/third party requests.

Offenders
warn(0)Set X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff to stop the browser from MIME-sniffing the response.xContentTypeOptionsHeader

Set X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff on the document response to prevent MIME-sniffing.

X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff prevents browsers from interpreting files as a different MIME type than what is declared in the Content-Type header. This blocks a class of cross-site scripting and content-type confusion attacks and should be set on every response. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/X-Content-Type-Options

Offenders

Page info

A snapshot of what the browser actually built for this page: the document, how big and deep the DOM tree is and what it kept in storage. Big, deep trees are slower to style and lay out, so the counts Chrome warns about carry a flag.

Page info

Document

What the page says it is and how large it rendered.

TitleIT Services & Solutions | App Dev, AI, Cloud, Blockchain | MatchBest SoftwareThe document title, shown in the browser tab and used by search results.
Layout viewport1361 × 4818 pxThe width the page laid out at, and the full height of the rendered document.

DOM structure

How much markup the browser has to build, style and lay out.

DOM elements833Large, watch layout costTotal HTML elements. Fewer means less for the browser to style, lay out and paint.
Avg DOM depth8How deeply elements are nested on average.
Max DOM depth13The deepest nesting on the page. Deep branches cost more style recalculation.
Iframes1Embedded documents. Each is a separate page the browser loads and renders.
Script tags22Number of script elements. More scripts usually means more main-thread work.

Storage and connection

What the page stored on the client, and the network it was tested on.

Local storage0 bData the page saved in localStorage, kept across visits.
Session storage0 bData kept in sessionStorage for this tab session only.
Connection type4GWhat the Network Information API reported for the test connection.

Technologies used to build the page

Data collected using Coach-core version 9.2.1. With updated code from Webappanalyzer 2026-05-04. Use --browsertime.firefox.includeResponseBodies html or --browsertime.chrome.includeResponseBodies html to help Wappalyzer find more information about technologies used.

Detected technologies

7 technologies
  • UbuntuConfidence100
    Operating systems
  • ReactConfidence100
    JavaScript frameworks
  • Nginx1.28.3Confidence100
    Web serversReverse proxies
  • Next.jsConfidence100
    JavaScript frameworksWeb frameworksWeb serversStatic site generator
  • HSTSConfidence100
    Security
  • WebpackConfidence100
    Miscellaneous
  • HTTP/3Confidence100
    Miscellaneous

Third-party tools

4 tools

Data collected using Third Party Web version 0.29.2.

Tag-manager
  • Google Tag Manager
Surveillance
  • Google Tag Manager
  • Google Analytics
Analytics
  • Google Analytics

Visual Metrics

Visual milestones

all times from navigation start
Speed Index3.92 show quickly the page looked done
First Visual Change1.93 sfirst paint reaches the screen
Last Visual Change11.23 sscreen stops changing · 9.30 s after first
≥85%
1.93 sFirst Visual Change
3.70 sVisual Complete 85%
Visual Complete 95%10.77 s
Visual Complete 99% · Last Visual Change11.23 s
Visual Readiness9.30 s· first to last change
02.0 s4.0 s6.0 s8.0 s10.0 s
Content milestones
Perception index
Visual progress
Visual progress at 0 s0.0s
Visual progress at 3.2 s3.2s
Visual progress at 4.5 s4.5s
Visual progress at 5.9 s5.9s
Visual progress at 7.2 s7.2s
Visual progress at 8.6 s8.6s
Visual progress at 9.9 s9.9s
Visual progress at 11.3 s11.3s
FCP1.99s
LCP3.42s
VC853.70s
Long tasks
0.0s2.3s4.5s6.8s9.0s11.3s

Google Web Vitals

1.217 sTTFB
Needs improvement
1.992 sFCP
Needs improvement
3.420 sLCP
Needs improvement
706 msTBT
Poor

Largest Contentful Paint

When the page main content is rendered, collected via the Largest Contentful Paint API. Read more about Largest Contentful Paint.

3.420 sLCP render time

Phase breakdown

  • TTFB1.217 s
  • Resource load delay37 ms
  • Resource load duration1.014 s
  • Element render delay1.152 s

Element

Element type
<img>
Size (w × h)
97516
URL
https://matchbestsof...e.com/_next/image
Load time
2.292 s

DOM path

body > main > section:eq(0) > div:eq(1) > div:eq(1) > div:eq(0) > img:eq(1)
LCP

The LCP element is highlighted in the screenshot. If nothing is highlighted the element was removed before the screenshot or the LCP API couldn't find it.

The Largest Contentful Paint API matched this image:

LCP element

Cumulative Layout Shift

How much the page's content shifts as it loads, collected via the Cumulative Layout Shift API.

0.008cumulative layout shift score

One shift is 100% of your 0.008 CLS. svg moved at 2.003 s. Reserve space for whatever renders into that spot, a fixed height or an aspect-ratio box, so later content stops pushing the page around.

Elements that shifted

Worst first, showing shifts of 0.01 and up. Each percentage is that shift's exact share of the score.

The shift is spread across many movements below 0.01, none large enough to single out. Check the video or filmstrip to see what moved.

Layout shift

Elements that shifted by more than 0.01 are highlighted in the screenshot. If an element shifted outside the viewport, it won't appear here. Check the video or filmstrip to see the shift.

Browser Metrics

Navigation Timing
Extra timings
TTFB1.217 s
Fully loaded19.362 s

Custom metrics collected through JavaScript

There are no custom configured scripts.

Extra metrics collected using scripting

There are no custom extra metrics from scripting.

Chrome internal metrics (CDP)33
Audio handlers0
Audio worklet processors0
Documents7
Frames8
JS event listeners477
Layout objects1066
Media key sessions0
Media keys0
Nodes1424
Resources70
Context lifecycle state observers39
V8 per context datas4
Worker global scopes0
Uacss resources0
Rtc peer connections0
Resource fetchers7
Ad subframes0
Detached script states2
Array buffer contents17
Layout count15
Recalc style count969
Layout duration193
Recalc style duration452
Dev tools command duration16
Script duration907
V8 compile duration1
Task duration8874
Task other duration7305
Thread time3
Process time9
JS heap used size11565548
JS heap total size14417920
First meaningful paint1990

PageXray

How the page is built.

HTTP versionHTTP/1.1
Total requests45
Total domains3
Transfer size970.1 KB
Content size14.8 MB
Missing compression0

Main document

status 200 · 0 redirects

https://matchbestsoftware.com/

HeaderValue
cache-controls-maxage=31536000
connectionkeep-alive
content-encodinggzip
content-typetext/html; charset=utf-8
dateThu, 06 Aug 2026 14:40:49 GMT
etag"xg4ta7ttlz2ewm"
servernginx/1.28.3 (Ubuntu)
transfer-encodingchunked
varyrsc, next-router-state-tree, next-router-prefetch, next-router-segment-prefetch, Accept-Encoding
x-powered-byNext.js
x-nextjs-cacheHIT
x-nextjs-prerender1 1
x-nextjs-stale-time300

Response codes

200
4191.1%
204
12.2%
206
36.7%

Requests and sizes per content type

9 types

Transfer size970.2 KB

  • javascript44.4%
  • image41.7%
  • css3.9%
  • font3.6%
  • other2.1%
  • html1.9%
  • video1.5%
  • favicon0.89%

Content size14.8 MB

  • video86.0%
  • javascript9.0%
  • image2.7%
  • css0.85%
  • html0.73%
  • other0.43%
  • font0.23%
  • favicon0.10%

Requests45

  • javascript44.4%
  • image24.4%
  • other11.1%
  • video6.7%
  • css4.4%
  • html2.2%
  • font2.2%
  • favicon2.2%
  • plain2.2%
ContentHeader SizeTransfer SizeContent SizeRequests
html460 B18.6 KB110.1 KB1
css747 B38.0 KB129.4 KB2
javascript7.1 KB430.9 KB1.3 MB20
image4.5 KB404.7 KB404.7 KB11
font308 B34.5 KB34.5 KB1
favicon344 B8.6 KB15.0 KB1
plain0 b0 b0 b1
video1010 B14.9 KB12.7 MB3
other1.9 KB19.9 KB65.9 KB5
Total16.3 KB970.2 KB14.8 MB45

Data per domain

3 domains
DomainTotal download timeTransfer SizeContent SizeRequests
matchbestsoftware.com32.274 s804.4 KB14.3 MB43
www.googletagmanager.com290 ms165.7 KB484.9 KB1
www.google-analytics.com281 msN/A0 b1

Expires & last-modified statistics

typeminmedianmax
Expires0 seconds15 minutes1 year
Last modified6 days6 days6 days

Requests loaded after onLoad event

1 request

Includes requests done after load event end.

ContentTransfer SizeRequests
html0 b0
css0 b0
javascript0 b0
image0 b0
font0 b0
favicon8.6 KB1
Total8.6 KB1

Requests loaded after onContentLoad

30 requests

Includes requests done after DOM content loaded.

ContentTransfer SizeRequests
html0 b0
css24.1 KB1
javascript165.0 KB15
image213.0 KB4
font0 b0
favicon8.6 KB1
plain0 b1
video14.9 KB3
other19.9 KB5
Total445.6 KB30

Third party

Third party requests categorised by Third party web version 0.29.2.

Third-party requests4
Tools2
Categories3

Categories

3 categories

Requests by category4

  • survelliance2 req · 2 tools50.0%
  • tag-manager1 req · 1 tool25.0%
  • analytics1 req · 1 tool25.0%

Third party requests and tools

3 categories
tag-managerGoogle Tag Manager1 requests · 1 tool
survellianceGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics2 requests · 2 tools
analyticsGoogle Analytics1 requests · 1 tool

First party vs third party

43 first · 2 third party

Transfer size970.1 KB

  • First party804.4 KB82.9%
  • Third party165.7 KB17.1%

Content size14.8 MB

  • First party14.3 MB96.8%
  • Third party484.9 KB3.2%

Requests45

  • First party4395.6%
  • Third party24.4%

First party requests and sizes per content type

43 requests

Calculated using .*matchbestsoftware.* (use --firstParty to configure).

ContentHeader SizeTransfer SizeContent SizeRequests
html460 B18.6 KB110.1 KB1
css747 B38.0 KB129.4 KB2
javascript7.1 KB265.2 KB877.8 KB19
image4.5 KB404.7 KB404.7 KB11
font308 B34.5 KB34.5 KB1
favicon344 B8.6 KB15.0 KB1
video1010 B14.9 KB12.7 MB3
other1.9 KB19.9 KB65.9 KB5
Total16.3 KB804.4 KB14.3 MB43

Third party requests and sizes per content type

2 requests
ContentHeader SizeTransfer SizeContent SizeRequests
html0 b0 b0 b0
css0 b0 b0 b0
javascript0 b165.7 KB484.9 KB1
image0 b0 b0 b0
font0 b0 b0 b0
favicon0 b0 b0 b0
plain0 b0 b0 b1
TotalN/A165.7 KB484.9 KB2